RFC: Release team meetings
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Apr 13 13:04:00 UTC 2007
On Friday 13 April 2007 01:05:05 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> I'd further would like to see more informations what the Release Team is
> (number of people and names), how it is constituted (approved, elected,
> mixed?), who's responsible (chairmen?) and what its works areas exactly
> are (what remains FESCo work and what will the Release Team take care
> of? and when does the Board get into the game?).
It's things like this that start to frustrate me. Sure it's neat information
to have, but for the sake of getting a few people together to get some work
done, I really don't want to have to go through the headache of creating all
this red tape and governance. Now, I don't think that some of this is bad to
have, it just makes the barrier of entry to having a group of people work on
something pretty daunting. It's part of the reason why I _haven't_ yet
created the sig page for the release team, thinking about this crud gives me
a headache.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20070413/9eefcfec/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list