RFC: Release team meetings

[Bill Nottingham]

Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora at leemhuis.info) said: 
> > == Composition ==
> >  * Jesse Keating (f13)
> >  * Josh Boyer (jwb)
> >  * Bill Nottingham (notting)
> >  * Jeremy Katz (katzj)
> >  * [Please fill in and correct]
> 
> I'd say the maybe the body that makes the decisions should have a
> defined size. Maybe 7 or 9 members -- that's not to much (otherwise
> nobody might feel responsible) and not to less (to much work for
> everyone). The size of the group/team/SIG itself of course is not limited.

OK, this is where I start yelling.

We've got a release coming up, and we need to coordinate to make sure things
get done. So a proposal is made on how to make sure the right people meet
with the right people to get things done and organized.

So, of course, it then moves to:
- discussion of meeting times
- naming of representatives suggestions of representatives
- agenda for the first meeting
- discussion of blockers

Wait, no, *all the discussion is around GROUP SIZE and MAILING LIST NAMES*?

Gah. If people need people to write interminable process documents before they
feel they can get involved, then we've screwed up this project so bad it's
not funny.

Bill