RFC: Release team meetings

[Josh Boyer]

On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:49 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Jason L Tibbitts III schrieb:
> >>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> writes:
> > 
> > JK> Sure it's neat information to have, but for the sake of getting a
> > JK> few people together to get some work done, I really don't want to
> > JK> have to go through the headache of creating all this red tape and
> > JK> governance.
> > 
> > As far as I can tell all you really need is something that tells
> > people where to look if they want to become involved in the process.
> > What list should they join (if there's a list)?  What IRC channel
> > should they join (if there's IRC discussion)?  If you decide to have
> > meetings (and nothing requires that as far as I can see) then say when
> > and where the meetings are held.
> > 
> > That's about it. 
> 
> Agreed if you add a "post a summary of important decisions so the public
> and FESCo (and thus the board) know what got decided"

To clarify, there actually haven't been very many discussions so far.  A
few update requests during the freeze, and that's about it.  What Bill
proposed would actually _be_ the first important discussion.

Everything of sufficient importance has so far been discussed in public
or at least disclosed to the public shortly thereafter.  Do not mistake
silence for a cabal.  Sometimes there just aren't any discussions going
on :).

josh