Codec buddy and Free software

[Karsten Wade]

On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 10:19 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:

> Ha, so we have 2 camps:
> 1.  Let's not decide, until legal says it's ok.
> 2.  Let's not take it to legal, until we're sure we want to try to do this.

If the vote lands with the first camp, I might hand-off the "talk with
Legal" responsibility.  I'm very cautious about when I use my "Fishing
Expedition With Legal" tickets, I don't have enough to share with
everyone.

> fwiw, the board did ask for such clarification from Mark, and from 
> initial comments, looks like this may be something we can do.  No 
> commitment, mind you, partly because we don't have the necessary 
> implementation details sorted out yet.

For the edification of the current Board, can anyone find this thread in
the archives and expose it on f-board-l for us to peruse?  Again, I'd
like to know _exactly_ what has been asked and answered of Mark before I
go asking anything again.  Been there, done that, don't want to do it no
more.

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20070718/b167f3c7/attachment.sig>