governance, fesco, board, etc.

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:16:49PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 17:43 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:02:26PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:37 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:49 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:05:57AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > > > > > > > ATM, I am seeing to many "dark room" decisions taking
> > > > > > > > > effect, which are not in the community's interest.
> > > > > > Prominent community members have been doing (and still do) just as
> > > > > > much backstage talking as RH people. Anyway this is another story.
> 
> > But fesco is not a political organ, it is an engineering group
> > managing all technical issues in Fedora. The political organ is the
> > board.
> 
> In FE FESCo was a democratically elected political organ, now "the
> board" has taken over => FESCo is superfluous, the elections are
> superfluous.

Not true, whatever fesco could do back then it can do now as well and
much more. Or did fesco control the release process of Core in "the
good old days"?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20070612/00d1071c/attachment.sig>