governance, fesco, board, etc.

Karsten Wade kwade at redhat.com
Wed Jun 13 17:40:22 UTC 2007


On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 07:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > * Before: FE had a functional work-flow, functional simple reviews,
> >   functional bugzilla, some bureaucracy, non-functional QA.
> >   Now: koji, bodhi, flagged-reviews, broken bugzilla, more bureaucracy,
> >   still non-functional QA.
> 
> I've seen you say this.  I think I have seen other contributors agree
> with some of those points.  We're addressing them as fast as we can.

And in support Ralf's point that we need to pursue releasing early and
releasing often, thanks to rel-eng and QA for DOING EXACTLY THAT.

We can't wait for the new QA system to be perfect before we start using
it, can we?  That is the Cathedral model.

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20070613/47b8fb54/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list