[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: governance, fesco, board, etc.



On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 22:29 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:35:22 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 09:23 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Thursday 14 June 2007 08:01:37 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > > > I have to call BS on this one.
> > > >
> > > > Ask yourself. Is anything about this really working?
> > > 
> > > Yes, for many things and many cases things are working quite well.  There are 
> > > some rough spots, nobody is saying it's perfect, but to say that it's 
> > > completely non-functional is just bologna.
> > Then let me ask directly: How could it happen that this kernel package
> > was released?
> > 
> > My interpretation of this incident: "system failure".
> > Whatever this system is - be it automatic, be it human.
> > 
> > IMO, EVR breakages and repo inconsistency are avoidable and would expect
> > Michael to have scripts for this.
> 
> As I don't completely understand that sentence, just to make one thing
> clear, I'm not involved in F7 update releases at all.
You have been posting reports of EVR breakages/broken package deps in 
FC+FE for a long time and therefore thought you to have scripts to
perform such repo-consistency checks automatically.

Running such a script on a repo + "the packages to be pushed" before
pushing the new packages would have caught this case.

Ralf




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]