Secondary ARCH

Christopher Blizzard blizzard at redhat.com
Mon Mar 5 18:26:46 UTC 2007


On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 11:36 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007 11:19:47 am Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 11:12 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > There's a SPARC build and an ia64 build for Fedora right now.  This
> > > stuff isn't easy to do and we need to figure out a way to at least host
> > > their code/binaries.  I'd like to create a place under
> > > fedoraproject.org, more preferably on the mirrors.  Possibly under
> > > /secondary/ or something like that.  Lets get this figured out because
> > > waiting any longer is a great disservice to the work these people have
> > > done.
> >
> > I think the first step is talking to the various parties and figuring
> > out how much space they really need.
> 
> Well the current corona tree for sparc is 18GB  and that is without iso's that 
> is for core and extras. 
> 
> IA64 i think He is just wanting his iso's composed from rawhide hosted.  
> though very soon there will not be any ia64 rawhide builds unless we get ia64 
> builders donated. what policies in general do we want to have on secondary 
> archs? 
> 
> 

What's needed other than a set of output rpms and isos?  From what I
remember of the meeting we had a few months ago we expected secondary
arch builds to happen on contributed machines, but wanted to host final
bits.  That should be our target, right?

i.e. are there other things that we need to have in place for adding
capacity down the road?  And what capacity is it?  We need a little
brainstorming.

--Chris




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list