FS/OSS license: not quite enough of a requirement

[Karsten Wade]

On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 06:50 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

> I think that in your wiki writeup (you can do a draft under your own
> page) 

Although it doesn't (yet) exist, I set a watch on AlexandreOliva.* for
Wiki changes.  I'm interested in helping out with this.  I think a
well-written "Fedora Promise" is good for us.  As with others on this
list, it would be easiest for me to test the quality of draft by reading
it. :)

One recommendation is to get a final version together, and then have it
vetted by a lawyer.  The reason being, words have different meanings
under a legal context that we would never imagine in other contexts.
This is just basic QA.

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20070514/6d9746b7/attachment.sig>