Why 'secondary architectures'?

Stephen John Smoogen smooge at gmail.com
Tue Nov 13 02:26:46 UTC 2007


On Nov 12, 2007 7:29 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:26:23 -0700
> "Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 11, 2007 6:21 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 14:06 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > > Now that Fedora 8 is out, I'd like to make a suggestion with regard to
> > > > PPC.  It's no secret that we've been talking about dropping PPC. First
> > > > it was all together, then it was so that it could be come a secondary
> > > > arch.  So far, we've failed to execute.
> > >
> > > Digressing from the technical side, I'd like to properly understand your
> > > motivation. _Why_ do you want to do this?
> > >
> > ... Long rant snipped ...
> >
> > I would say that David is volunteering to run the PPC SIG then.
>
> He's been doing that for a long time already.
>

And I am an ignoramus once again.. cranky man goes back to cleaning up
users directories.



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list