Fedora Games Spin : Requesting Board Approval

[Jeremy Katz]

On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 12:21 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 11:16 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> Though the question of QA is a good one.  
> >> I've not looked at how customized (and therefore different) from Fedora 
> >> a spin can get to the point where it'd need a separate QA path.
> >
> > I'm okay (Will will have to speak for himself though) if the QA is done
> > as part of the SIG who's working on it.  That plus review of the config
> > should be pretty good for finding problems.
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something.  In order for it to be considered an 
> official 'Fedora Spin' it has to only use bits in Fedora.  In order for 
> it to be in Fedora it is covered by Fedora QA right?  Anything that 
> works in Fedora but not in the spin I guess would fall on the SIG to fix 
> but what scenarios would that occur?

Just because the bits are there doesn't mean that the combination of
bits boots and works.  And that's the focus of the testing --
integration testing as opposed to component testing

Jeremy