Fedora Games Spin : Requesting Board Approval
Jeremy Katz
katzj at redhat.com
Thu Sep 27 17:24:56 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 12:21 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 11:16 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> Though the question of QA is a good one.
> >> I've not looked at how customized (and therefore different) from Fedora
> >> a spin can get to the point where it'd need a separate QA path.
> >
> > I'm okay (Will will have to speak for himself though) if the QA is done
> > as part of the SIG who's working on it. That plus review of the config
> > should be pretty good for finding problems.
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something. In order for it to be considered an
> official 'Fedora Spin' it has to only use bits in Fedora. In order for
> it to be in Fedora it is covered by Fedora QA right? Anything that
> works in Fedora but not in the spin I guess would fall on the SIG to fix
> but what scenarios would that occur?
Just because the bits are there doesn't mean that the combination of
bits boots and works. And that's the focus of the testing --
integration testing as opposed to component testing
Jeremy
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list