Elected/Appointed Board

[seth vidal]

On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 20:29 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> That is something I've been thinking about recently.
> 
> I think we should remove the option for an elected member of FESCo or 
> the Board to 'abstain' or vote '+0' unless there is a legitimate 
> conflict of interest or reason with merit such as complete unfamiliarity 
> with an area.  It seems to me that voting '+0' is really voting '-1' 
> without conviction and that dilutes the process... something along the 
> lines of 'if you chose not to decide you still have made a choice'.
> 

Wow, you know it is getting serious when you break out the rush lyrics.

-sv