On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > Perhaps a good solution is to allow participants to opt in on a per-vote > basis: a checkbox that says "I consent to having my anonymized vote > published" could appear right on the vote form. (Vote data should also > be randomly ordered so that time-correlation is not possible). This I like best, because it's a per voter, per instance thing, rather than a set of voters today deciding things for sets of voters in the future. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
Description: This is a digitally signed message part