Fedora Board election results

[Greg Dekoenigsberg]

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
>
>>> I can see a lot of good points in the discussion.  But if it all boils
>>> down to "I don't have time to participate in Fedora governance," then just
>>> say that.  Because that's really what you are saying.
>>
>> Partially correct.
>>
>> Better would be: I don't have time nor interest in actively
>> participating in this governance system. I do have the time and interest
>> to vote on MY delegate, such that I feel my opinion is represented in
>> this "governance system".
>>
>
> I think we are still suffering from communication bit loss somewhere
> (German to English or just the human usual I forgot to type
> something). Are you wanting regional representational democracy?
> organizational representational democracy? parliamentary system?
> republic system? A constitutional system?

At times like this, I think it's simplest to solicit an actual proposal.

If the current governance system is suboptimal, let's see a proposal for 
an alternative system of governance.

--g