[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Follow-up on Extended Life Cycle



On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:53:58AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:25:44AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> As I recall,this Extended Life Cycle feature is already defined to
>> cover everything, so that wouldn't be necessary.
>
>I'm reading here:
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle#Detailed_Description
>
>I don't see any such definition.  I also don't see a definition for
>the length of time, or issue severity coverage.  (The last of these,
>to be fair, Jeroen explicitly asked us to weigh in on.)
>
>Furthermore:
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle#Scope
>
>There's an admonition that says, "Note that the following items may
>only apply to those that opt-in on ELC support."  That sounds pretty
>open-ended too.  If Jeroen and the rest of the group signed up on the
>wiki page are interested in doing this in Fedora, they need to round
>up those details and put them in the page for consideration.

I spoke with Jeroen about that this morning.  He said he was going to rework
the wiki page soon.

josh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]