[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Follow-up on Extended Life Cycle



On 07/21/2009 04:14 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Bill Nottingham<notting redhat com>  wrote:
Greg DeKoenigsberg (gdk redhat com) said:
I'm guessing that this 1 fulltime person in a security response team
role is to track, monitor, and coordinate the issues that need to be
addressed. Which in many cases is different from the devel, releng and
test aspects - necessitating much more than 1 fulltime person's worth
of work to pull off the broader initiative. Â Right?
In the world of RHEL, this would certainly be true -- but in the world of
Fedora?
Note that also there are likely to be *more* issues to track in Fedora
than in RHEL; after all, Fedora is much larger.

Is it necessary to go all-or-nothing, or is there a smart and simple
way to only issue updates for a subset of Fedora's packages (eg. the
ones that are shipped on the DVD for example)?


This is a dead end and is *not* going to happen.

-- Jeroen


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]