[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Beta packages within stable releases



On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Ken Chilton wrote:
There used to be a practice in all things Linux where even-numbered release numbers implied stable releases, where
odd-numbered releases were development tracks.  The Linux kernel follows such a scheme, with 2.4.x and 2.6.x being the
(more) stable.

*Did follow such a scheme, but no longer. There is no 2.7.x for kinky development thingies for 2.8.x like there was 2.5.x for kinky 2.6.x development thingies, afaik.

-- Jeroen


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]