[Ambassadors] Active/Inactive Ambassadors+task+some idea

[Brian Pepple]

On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 20:45 +0200, Francesco Ugolini wrote:
> The difference is that we don't punish people we award those. :)
> 
> Regards
> 
> Francesco Ugolini
> 
> Brian Pepple ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 19:58 +0200, Francesco Ugolini wrote:
> >> With Sankarshan idea we don't take care of inactive ambassador, we will,
> >> only, mark active people who work.
> > 
> > How is this any different than marking inactive people?
> > 
> > /B

My question was though, that if you are marking the active ambassadors,
how is that any different from marking the inactive ones?

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20070406/f3ffceaa/attachment.sig>