[Ambassadors] Active/Inactive Ambassadors+task+some idea

[Marc Wiriadisastra]

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 08:26 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Francesco Ugolini wrote:
> 
> > Stay sure, we don't want to "kill" people, we know the different needs
> > of each ambassador. We want to shake people that do nothing.
> 
> Why?
> 
> Why do we want to "shake people that do nothing"?  What harm do they do? 
> And what's to say that someone who does nothing today won't be someone who 
> does something vitally important later?  And what's your threshhold for 
> "activity" -- somebody says "I'm active"?
> 
> The *only* effect of *any* inactivity policy will be to announce to 
> people, "we don't want you, go away."
> 
> My $0.02: once somebody says "I am a Fedora ambassador," then they are a 
> Fedora ambassador, FOR LIFE.  Until (a) they say "no thanks, I'm not an 
> ambassador anymore," or (b) they do something that disgraces Fedora, and 
> FAMSCO drums them out.
> 
> =====
> 
> So let me back up and ask a question.  What's the *real* goal here?
> 
> Is the goal to recognize our best ambassadors?
> 
> Is the goal to know who can be "counted upon" to get stuff done?
> 
> What are we trying to accomplish with the active/inactive proposal?
> 
> --g
+1 to Greg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20070409/a3baa2c7/attachment.sig>