[Ambassadors] Ambassadors list

[Robert Scheck]

On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> I think more openness would serve this purpose well.  However, I'm not
> going to ask for a change if someone can convince me that this kind of
> collaboration would be harmful to Ambassadors overall.  What do you
> think, FAMSCo?  Ambassadors?

I dislike the idea of an open fedora-ambassadors-list. I'm sorry to say
that, but there's already to much non-ambassadors stuff on the list by
people mixing up marketing and ambassadors IMHO. So if an opening of this
list really should happen, I will unsubscribe myself immediately. Sorry.

If everybody is allowed to write on the list, being a contributor is the
same as being an ambassador then. And then we don't need this list at all.
That's a simple decision for me...


Greetings,
  Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20080912/ab59da78/attachment.sig>