[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Ambassadors] Ambassadors list



On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 01:24 +0200, Francesco Ugolini wrote:
> 2008/9/13 Francesco Ugolini <fugolini fedoraproject org>:
> > I think all your argumentations are reasonable as I just said in my
> > previous messages. I have bother respect and consideration for you and
> > I think the reason behind this proposal are not unjustified.
> 
> I'm Sorry I wanted to say both, not bother.
> 
> Once again I apologize for this big/serious mistake.

Not serious, and no worries Francesco.  I understood your meaning! :-)

I hope people will consider how, for example, packagers have the choice
to open up their package access to all packagers, as I and many others
do.  If I can't spring into action to fix a package for some reason, any
other packager can do it in my place.

Thank you for your considerate email and time thinking about this issue.
You can rest assured that I'll respect the decision of FAMSCo and the
Ambassadors community.

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]