[Ambassadors] During some of my review of the Fedora 12 "Constantine, " Fedora 12 Talking Points. :)

[Rahul Sundaram]

On 12/24/2009 05:46 AM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Community includes Red Hat folks one would hope.
> 
> Well that's debatable. But irrelevant to this thread, let's skip it.

I would like to hear more about the debate on that. I think its quite
relevant. If not in this thread, feel free to create a new thread on it.

> Ah no, I'm not aggressive. I just want to stress that if my contents
> about FEL 12 were removed with an unjustified reason, all non-relevant
> contents should bear the same consequence. As it's unfair for the
> unpaid amount of time spent for nothing.

FEL is a useful spin but it is very much a niche audience. Would you say
its unfair to promote only one spin?

I understand your point but IMO, you should use your spin page to
promote the spin. That's really the best place for spin specific content.

>> The talking points
>> are derived from the feature list, plain and simple.
>
> So why do we need a "Talking Points" wiki page if it would be an
> enhanced copy of the feature list ?

Feature list pages are useful for coordination of the development
itself. Talking points is more end user focussed. That's a important
difference.

Rahul