Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 15:51:50 schrieb inode0: > Can the FAmSCo membership folks suggest a good way to deal with this? > Thanks for bringing up one option we have Susmit. This is a festering > problem that is only going to get worse the longer we ignore it. I have not read all emails in this thread right now and posted similar intention to this topic to famsco-list before - all this reminds me to the famous active/inactive discussion we had ;) in 2007 <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/2007- April/msg00004.html> We should notice that people like EvilBob and others, left Ambassadors because whe have no quality measures like the packagers, artwork, infra or docs where they have to proof commitment before they get sponsored. If you want that someone have to proof a real contribution before i can sponsor him, how should quality measures look like? A Ambassador should be noisy in his work, but we need to be carefull with judging the work of our not so noisy fellows, we should offer them our help in form of mentoring and leave them alone, if they do not want our help - as long as they make no harm to the project or the reputation of other Ambassadors. We have many glorious examples how valuable contribution within Ambassador Group can look like and i understand that all hard working Ambassadors are annoyed if they did not get help from Ambassadors around there regional Area. But what is our real goal? We should not waste our Power with hunting inactive Ambassadors, lets put this energy in better mentoring and better tools to increase our quality. CU Joerg -- Joerg (kital) Simon jsimon fedoraproject org http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon http://kitall.blogspot.com Key Fingerprint: 3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.