[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Ambassadors] inactive ambassadors, a proposed solution



+1

2009/2/20 Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <foss mailinglists gmail com>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Max Spevack <mspevack redhat com> wrote:

> WHAT DO WE DO WITH INACTIVE AMBASSADORS?
>
> If someone is inactive, we *DO NOT* kick them out of the ambassadors group
> in FAS, and we *DO NOT* remove them from fedora-ambassadors list.
>
> But we should remove them from the "directory of Ambassadors sorted by
> country", which I argue again needs to be much more visible and useful, so
> that those inactive Ambassadors aren't being asked to do public-facing
> things.
>
> When someone re-surfaces or has more time for Ambassadors, we put them back
> on the directory.

+1 to this and, thanks for writing this up.

--

http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published
http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science
http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work

--



--
tatica
Maria Gracia Leandro
http://www.tatica.org
http://www.iseit.net
http://www.latinux.org
http://www.latinux.com
http://www.fedora-ve.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MariaLeandro
LinuxUser= 440285
GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56
"Be yourself... Don't be anyone else"

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]