[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Ambassadors] inactive ambassadors, a proposed solution



On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 08:26 -0600, inode0 wrote:

> Here is where I think there is a much simpler approach. Do they
> respond to email at whatever address they have listed on the wiki. If
> no that means they aren't paying attention to being the wiki face of
> Fedora and probably would be fine not being a part of that piece of
> the ambassador puzzle. Really at this point that is the only piece
> that concerns me.

I also think this is a good idea, at the same time we verify the
accuracy of the FAS accounts.

Steven


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]