[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Ambassadors] Active or Inactive



Yes, I too am support Li, Songlin. Why we need to discuss this and waste
our time?
Better talk on something else.
There is no point on talking on "active" or "inactive".

Li, Songlin wrote:
> It's boring arguing about "active" and "inactive".
> I am wondering why we want to talk about this.
>
> 2009/2/26 Hernan Pachas <hernan pachas gmail com>
>
>   
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>>>> In my opinion, anyone who cares to read, think about, or respond to
>>>> this ongoing thread is considered active :)
>>>>         
>>> OK, I was holding back so as not to add to the noise, but if I'm
>>> required to do so.. ;-)
>>> --
>>> Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
>>> Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
>>> Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
>>> Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
>>> Fedora-ambassadors-list redhat com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
>> Fedora-ambassadors-list redhat com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
>   


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]