[Ambassadors] mentorship, sponsorship, etc.

[Mani A]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Quality of Ambassadors:

I think the best way to measure it is through a simple credit system.

1. a.)  Ambassador /prospective ambassador reads *important* article
       (Only some articles may be eligible for credit)
    b.) Prospective ambassador answers related multiple choice questions
    c.) If a minimum score of 90% is not attained, then the candidate
goes through the whole process again.

On successful completion, candidate gets 1 credit or some credit.

2.  a.) Ambassador/prospective ambassador contributes X no of commits
to a Fedora project.

We know plenty of inefficient code metrics. Based on a less
inefficient one we give some credit to the candidate.

Only exceptionally hard working programmers should be able to become
ambassadors based on their code contribution alone.

3.   Ambassador /prospective ambassador writes a article in

This is getting long.
Shall I make a wiki page for the evaluation system?


Best

A. Mani


 --
A. Mani
Member, Cal. Math. Soc



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknNT0cACgkQunMISzvdfU4NKACgnI5M+c7v3fCO8Lv1yIjsVJM8
OMwAnAkWS0Aw4oohE4UOPrm3AGp2eKvA
=m6M1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----