Form widgets on fpo website

[Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek]

Firefox3 provides beautiful native GTK widgets, so we shouldn't provide
CSS for them.

Dnia 26-12-2007, śro o godzinie 09:35 +0100, Martin Sourada pisze:
> On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 01:38 +0100, Michael Beckwith wrote:
> > Why should I do a google search for something you're arguing for? 
> > I don't have a problem with what I'm seeing when I visit the page. 
> > Just for the sake of not arguing, I did do a google search for 
> > both "native widgets" and didn't find any sort of examples of what 
> > I was asking for. Maybe I'm just blind, so if you could point one 
> > out like I asked, I'd be happy to click.
> > 
> 
> Personally I think he meant the google.com page itself as an example
> with the "right" widgets. So to show you the differences:
> this[ff-old.png] is start.fp.o in F8's epiphany, this[ff-native] is
> start.fp.o in FF3 and this[ff-fpo] is fp.o. I guess you see the
> difference on first sight ;)
> 
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-art-list mailing list
> Fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
-- 
                              __        _                ___ 
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek        / _|___ __| |___ _ _ __ _  ( _ )
Fedora Project              |  _/ -_) _` / _ \ '_/ _` | / _ \
http://liviopl.jogger.pl/   |_| \___\__,_\___/_| \__,_| \___/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: To jest cz??? wiadomo?ci podpisana cyfrowo
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20071226/560c5aaa/attachment.sig>