[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Form widgets on fpo website



It's not our problem, if browser renders widgets ugly.
We should provide native buttons or buttons with eye-candy bg.

2007/12/29, Rogue <roguexz gmail com >:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
> Firefox3 provides beautiful native GTK widgets, so we shouldn't provide
> CSS for them.
>

The idea of CSS styling of the widgets is to ensure that the widgets
look the same across different browsers.

Jakub, you are comparing how the widget looks in Firefox 3 alone. What
about other browsers? What if the native widgets in those other browsers
look terrible?

I would suggest that the overall CSS of FPO could be overhauled as part
of the F9 release?

Any thoughts on this one?

later,
Rogue
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHdeU7ceS9IQvx51YRAvapAKCo8mUTxdGEgEtMs6GiUfb4uFtG9wCfY5+3
PSpWsN2Cp7PDhB2GAZNs0YU=
=Ra6H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]