Form widgets on fpo website

[Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek]

It's not our problem, if browser renders widgets ugly.
We should provide native buttons or buttons with eye-candy bg.

2007/12/29, Rogue <roguexz at gmail.com>:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
> > Firefox3 provides beautiful native GTK widgets, so we shouldn't provide
> > CSS for them.
> >
>
> The idea of CSS styling of the widgets is to ensure that the widgets
> look the same across different browsers.
>
> Jakub, you are comparing how the widget looks in Firefox 3 alone. What
> about other browsers? What if the native widgets in those other browsers
> look terrible?
>
> I would suggest that the overall CSS of FPO could be overhauled as part
> of the F9 release?
>
> Any thoughts on this one?
>
> later,
> Rogue
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFHdeU7ceS9IQvx51YRAvapAKCo8mUTxdGEgEtMs6GiUfb4uFtG9wCfY5+3
> PSpWsN2Cp7PDhB2GAZNs0YU=
> =Ra6H
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-art-list mailing list
> Fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20071229/bfe72c29/attachment.htm>