[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora 8 theme proposal] Fedora Nodoka Round 1



> Yes. I would prefer a RPM package for testing changes. Have you done any 
> benchmarks to see how well it performs compared to the default theme?
> 
> http://www.manucornet.net/pub/olpc/gtk-theme-torturer.tgz
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/GTK_for_OLPC#GTK_theme.2Fengine_torturer_and_crash_tester
> 
> Better or atleast equivalent performance is important.
> 
> Rahul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-art-list mailing list
> Fedora-art-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list

As for the rpm. I've just created it [1]. As for the performance - I
tested only metacity theme, I don't know how to do benchmark on gtk
theme, but Daniel says murrine engine is faster then clearlooks. Here
are the results for metacity:

$ metacity-theme-viewer Clearlooks
Loaded theme "Clearlooks" in 0.01 seconds
Drew 100 frames in 0.17 client-side seconds (1.7 milliseconds per frame)
and 0.324083 seconds wall clock time including X server resources
(3.24083 milliseconds per frame)

$ metacity-theme-viewer Nodoka
Loaded theme "Nodoka" in 0.01 seconds
Drew 100 frames in 0.08 client-side seconds (0.8 milliseconds per frame)
and 0.141556 seconds wall clock time including X server resources
(1.41556 milliseconds per frame)

Martin

References:
[1]
http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC7/i386/nodoka-0.3-1.fc7.noarch.rpm

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]