[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Nodoka theme engine



On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:34 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Gah, I should have mentioned before; here is the usual split for
> packaging themes:
> 
> - engine goes in a separate package, together with the default theme
>   for that engine
> 
> - the metacity and metatheme go in another package, I don't care
>   too much if you split that up further
> 
> Ray is supposed to write an email about the artwork repackaging he has
> been doing on redhat-artwork recently, I don't know if he ended up doing
> separate packages for metacity themes. In any case, I'll poke Ray to
> send that mail, and then it would be good to follow the same pattern.
> 
> Splitting the engine part off is important, because the rest can be
> noarch (and is often large, think icon themes)
> 
> 
> Matthias
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-art-list mailing list
> Fedora-art-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list

Hm... I see the point... I wonder, if I split the metacity and metatheme
into subpackages, can the engine package be arch specific, and
subpackages noarch?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]