On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 16:23 +0200, Mark wrote: > Oke done it > > I think it still looks good ^_^ > But now that i've seen the source i have some more suggestions. You > aren't fully using the size that you can use. So if you bring the icon > itself a little more to the front than you can increase the shadow as > well. Also if you want the border to look good (or better) in the > 16x16 than you just have to fatten up the outter border a little. As you might noticed it looks rather as a flat icon positioned on an isometric grid - all depth is gone. I like the true flat one better - the isometric one isn't bad, but it is rather hard to recognise, harder to align to pixel grid,...
Description: This is a digitally signed message part