On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 20:18 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 18:56 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the current state of things in Echo is that we derive first from > > Clearlooks and then from Gnome. I'd suggest to drop the Clearlooks as > > the Gnome icon theme has already 22x22 icon set and so we would improve > > the current situation a lot. Also, I think that the Gnome icon theme > > styling is closer to Echo than Clearlooks is (and I'd strongly suggest > > to use Gnome or Tango metaphors rather than Bluecurve ones). It would be > > especially helpful for action icons as we use mostly the same > > perspective for these (flat). It has one drawback though (which should > > be easy to fix) - it uses gnome foot instead of fedora logo for the > > menu. Any thoughts on this? > > Having Clearlooks in the inheritance chain will not make a big > difference either way, since it is just a handful of icons: > > [mclasen localhost examples]$ find /usr/share/icons/Clearlooks/ -name > *.png | wc -l > 31 > But it seems it pulls Bluecurve in as well. When I disabled it a lot icons previously blurry are now OK, I didn't checked whether they are pulled from Clearlooks or Bluecurve though (some examples are dictionary, gimp, inkscape, take screenshot...).
Description: This is a digitally signed message part