FUDCon Boston Artwork

[Máirín Duffy]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Max Spevack wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>>
>>> I think the one with the pru in it (design #1) is better. You could 
>>> consider it final I think. The only concern is that it's derived from 
>>> a Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic photo. Is that okay? If not I 
>>> can probably go out and shoot some photos of the skyline and redo 
>>> this weekend.
>>
>> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/
>>
>> So we're not going to sell the shirts and admission to FUDCon is free, 
>> which means that it's not "commercial".
> 
> Well the "non-commercial" clause in the CC licenses are problematic for 
> various reasons including the issue of defining what exactly is 
> considered commercial activity. I think using a different picture that 
> allows commercial activity is better.

but it is just a tshirt right? and they're not going to be sold...

I can ask the photographer?

~m