Wallpaper Extras

Vara Prasad Pepakayala prasadpepakayala at gmail.com
Fri Aug 8 07:32:55 UTC 2008


Hi Frns... I have some Close up Obkects..  which I have shot using my
Nikon-D50... will you guys accept such content .. If ,so i will upload in
the next mail.
Thankyou..
Dreko

2008/8/7 Michael Beckwith <michael.d.beckwith at gmail.com>

>  How about uploading scaled down images to the wiki to show there, and
> uploading the full sized images to fedorapeople and providing a direct link
> to those on the wiki page with the gallery? May be a bit of extra work, but
> it'd save strain on the wiki.
>
> Martin Sourada wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 13:11 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>
>
>  For images stored in the wiki the thumbnails are created on the server.
>
>
>
>  Then I think uploading it to wiki directly is better way.
>
>
>
>  I was thinking about file sizes... the JPEGs straight from my camera are
> about 4.5-5MB, resized at 1920x1200, they will get under 1.5MB, but this
> is still quite large (and the file size will be a problem for the
> package too).
>
>
>
>  That's a drawback of providing quality images we need to pay if we
> decide to provide them. There are already packages in repos that have
> size around 200MB and the extras backgrounds would fall into that kind
> of packages too. Therefore I was thinking about splitting the package
> into sub-packages as per the (sub-)categories listed on the wiki + plus
> providing meta-packages to e.g. install all sub-categories of the
> specified category, or everything. That would be nicer to our users.
>
> Maybe even make separate packages for wide-screen wallpapers as people
> with 16:10 displays usually do not need 4:3 wallpapers and vice-versa.
>
> Another itchy thing is update of such packages. In environments with
> yum-presto the issue would not be big, but for standard fedora
> environment as it is now it means a lot of d/l with every update. That
> would mean we'd need to keep the updates low and/or rather than making
> sub-packages for categories, make the fully separate packages (but keep
> the sub-categories-subpackages).
>
> Btw. it is good thing to have upstream in more convenient place than
> wiki/rpm, therefore making a fedorahosted.org project for that might be
> a good idea. What do you think?
>
> Any ideas/comments on that matter?
>
> Martin
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-art-list mailing listFedora-art-list at redhat.comhttp://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
>
>
>
> --
> ~Michaelhttp://michaelbox.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-art-list mailing list
> Fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20080808/4e340ed7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Fedora-art-list mailing list