[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Transparency :)



On Jan 31, 2008 8:28 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta gmail com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 12:26 PM, Valent Turkovic <valent turkovic gmail com> wrote:
> > I wasn't trying to be rude or disrespectfully to gnome or gnome
> > developers. I was just wondering about gnome.
>
> Here's the problem with wondering aloud about gnome development on a
> list this is not about gnome development.  You only encourage the
> wrong sort of answers... uninformed answers.
>
> You need to take responsibility for the questions you ask and where
> you ask them.
>
> In the future, questions regarding suitability of patches need to be
> asked in the context of the upstream project. Not in a mailing list
> for artists.  And please refrain from feeding the trolls.  It's very
> easy to get stuck in a conversation with someone who has no real
> constructive information which aids your purpose, if you are talking
> about something in the wrong list. Its one thing to point something
> out because it looks cool and you want other people to know about. Its
> quite another to have a back and forth discussion about technical
> suitability that are out of scope. Any information obtained in such a
> draw out discussion is suspect, wasting your time and enthusiasm.
>
> -jef

Thank you Jeff for clearing that out, I'll watch out next time.

Valent.

-- 
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]