[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Name status



On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 10:08 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> 2008/6/26 Paul W. Frields <stickster gmail com>:
> > Legal rejected all the codenames for the Fedora 10 release, other than
> > "Red Hat Linux," that we sent in the top ten short list on which the
> > Board voted.
> 
> Can we get a summary from Legal on why the names were rejected?

If they're rejected, it's usually because there's a name collision with
an existing product that's close enough to Fedora that it's too risky to
use.  It's not because of general unease or fiat. :-)  

I'm trying not to generate too much pushback to Legal right now because
they are helping us with a number of other issues right now.  Does this
answer help at all?

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]