[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Remix mark



Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 11:13 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 10:24 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>>>> Máirín Duffy wrote:
>>>>> I would like to see the rounded logo done up with all these
>>>>> colors to make sure they don't make the 'remix' text too
>>>>> hard to read. If they don't that's what I recommend we go
>>>>> with. Does that sound reasonable?
>>>> Your wish is my command :p
>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_secondary_logo_drafts_nicubunu_color2.png
>>> Very nice!
>> Way to go! I think these look great.
>>
>> Using this, here's my stab at an initial (albeit sparse) set
>> of guidelines:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/2/29/Fedora_secondary_logo_draft_guidelines.png
>>
>> (I changed the blue lozenge to the lighter Fedora blue so it
>> would stand out on dark backgrounds better.)
> 
> Super work!  A couple corrections --
> 
> * Remixers are permitted to use transparency for filling the "remix"
> word where desired.  Counsel specifically agreed to this.

In practice it doesn't actually work that well. For 9 of the
10 background colors I used (the only one it really worked
for was black) you could hardly read "remix".
> 
> * The "recommended" palette should be marked as "approved" instead --
> unfortunately we don't have the option to allow an arbitrary color
> choice.

Oh I thought we had decided on a recommended palette and
were able to give folks the option to choose other colors?
So it's impossible for them to use osther colors?

~m


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]