[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Remix mark



On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 18:34 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > 
> > Using this, here's my stab at an initial (albeit sparse) set
> > of guidelines:
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/2/29/Fedora_secondary_logo_draft_guidelines.png
> 
> I like it, +1
> 
> The only change I can think of is putting the "light background" section 
> at the top. I believe you put "dark background" at the top for symmetry 
> with the red at the bottom, but I believe the white background/blue 
> logotype  will be the most used (and preferred), so is better to have it 
> at the top.

I think OLPC is waiting on us for this logo, so if I can get it to them
on Saturday, that would be great -- we're trying to make it into their
update build so that we can have this logo appear on a million machines
in the next year.  What's the verdict?

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]