New version of mock working (I think)

[Clark Williams]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:12 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>> I hate to throw water on the fire, but to me XML-RPC seems like a
>> sledgehammer.  There's actually a ton of code in xmlrpclib.py and for
>> this specific instance of pushing status information back to a
>> controlling process, I think it's somewhat heavy-handed.
>
> And I'll just pick this point in the thread to say that I agree with
> dcbw here....   KISS goes a long way.  And while we can say that it's
> configurable and you enable it if you want or don't if not -- that's
> then two code paths for status to have to keep working and ensure we
> don't break as well as maintaining them for some time
>

So where were you guys when I was playing Horatius at the bridge? :)

Clark

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEoUsnHyuj/+TTEp0RAq4XAKDMeKTgIn1TkGA1ikNq9CzETi054ACfZF8L
t2OhL8a/aKJ1QmxHpTq8jA0=
=qSJp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----