[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: mock buildroot definitions

On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 11:51 -0500, Mike McLean wrote:
> Chris Weyl wrote:
> > I like the idea, if it makes things more stable for a plague
> > implementation.  How would it be handled tho?  Different rpms for the
> > different groups?  (e.g., buildsys-base, buildsys-minimal, etc, etc) 
> > Or one big rpm?
> If we pursue this I recommend we use a more isolated naming scheme. 
> Someone might conceivably want to build a real package named 
> buildsys-base. Perhaps mock-abstract-group-{base,minimal,...}

just easier to have them as variables of: base, minimal, build

> I would like to have the original behavior available via configuration. 
> Surely yum will continue to have a groupinstall command.

why would you want to continue to support the buildgroups.xml file
format in mock? What does it benefit to maintain both sets of the code?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]