Mock going forward

[Jason L Tibbitts III]

>>>>> "CW" == Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> writes:

CW> A while ago and on a different list, tibbs proposed adding one
CW> last bit to the buildcycle:

Actually I think it was this list.

Honestly I don't think this needs to be in mock, but mock really needs
to continue to give me the means to do that kind of thing.  I already
have this running just fine with no mock modifications (with the
caveat that I can't figure out how to do this full process on an
x86_64 when building an i386 package).

 - J<