mash + koji write-signed-rpm
rob myers
rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu
Mon Jun 11 19:49:48 UTC 2007
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 15:11 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> rob myers (rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu) said:
> > why not have mash write a signed rpm out instead of just warning users
> > when a package has cached signatures, but no signed rpm?
> >
> > lightly tested patch attached.
>
> That would require the user running mash to authenticate to koji
> with a fairly high level of privelege, which seemed somewhat outside of
> the scope of it.
that makes sense. is there a more natural place for this sort of
housekeeping?
rob.
More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list
mailing list