mash + koji write-signed-rpm

rob myers rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu
Mon Jun 11 19:49:48 UTC 2007


On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 15:11 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> rob myers (rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu) said: 
> > why not have mash write a signed rpm out instead of just warning users
> > when a package has cached signatures, but no signed rpm?
> > 
> > lightly tested patch attached.
> 
> That would require the user running mash to authenticate to koji
> with a fairly high level of privelege, which seemed somewhat outside of
> the scope of it.

that makes sense.  is there a more natural place for this sort of
housekeeping?

rob.




More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list