mock rpmdb version issue with epel-5-i386 target

Dennis Gilmore dennis at ausil.us
Mon Sep 14 18:43:53 UTC 2009


On Monday 14 September 2009 01:09:26 pm Alan Franzoni wrote:
> 2009/9/14 Mike McLean <mikem at redhat.com>:
> > The chroot is created from outside the chroot, and hence uses that
> > version of rpm. Consider that when the process starts, there is no rpm in
> > the chroot to use.
>
> Yes, I had noticed that.
>
> > There is no back conversion. I'm not sure how this should affect any
> > deployment process for the resulting builds. The rpmdb in the chroot
> > should generally not be accessed by the build itself. Any such activity
> > in a spec file is unwise and questionable.
>
> Sure it is, and such activity is not performed inside any of any SPEC.
>
>  I think that maybe I just asked the wrong question.
>
> One of my targets is to build SRPMs inside an epel-5-i386 chroot; this
> can be done pretty easily with mock, but what if I have a dependency
> on an RPM which is not available in a yum repo? I'd like to test some
> internally built rpms in a pseudo-production environment *before*
> they're sent to our repo. So I just wanted to use "--copyin", then use
> --shell to manually invoke rpm and manually install such packages.
> Also, sometimes some packages have build dependencies that can't be
> satisfied by repos and should be installed manually (again, dependency
> on a test package).
build your srpm with --nodeps  that way you dont need the buildrequires 
packages installed to make your srpm.  this is how koji does it.

>
> If it's the quickest path I'll just setup an internal, testing only,
> can-be-trashed-at-any-time repository, possibly on the vary same
> machine hosting mock.

setup a local repo. is the easiest way. 

> Then I'll also need to build "full" images for some machines to deploy
> (e.g. a gzipped tar which holds the full operating system along with
> some rpms) in our testing environment, but I suppose I can use
> cobbler/koan for that, and I imagine they work differently and support
> a working rpm inside?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/attachments/20090914/5ff59e40/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list