replacing XMMS

[Brian Pepple]

On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:48, Colin Walters wrote:

> What I'm curious of is comments by people who still use XMMS, and why. 
> What are the most important things to you that need to be fixed in
> Rhythmbox?

I still use XMMS, since it's less CPU intensive than Rhythmbox.  On an
older machine Rhythmbox, tends to use too much resources.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/attachments/20040421/750733d9/attachment.sig>