f8 desktop livecd
Jeremy Katz
katzj at redhat.com
Tue Aug 7 18:05:15 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 07:51 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> By having a much tighter focus we need to revisit some our goals.
Just for historical background of a few of these (not saying we
shouldn't revisit them, but so everyone starts on the same page so to
speak)
> This includes goals like "is it important it fits on CD media",
Feedback from non-US/non-European based locales is that CD media is
still very important. The fact that the "Fedora spin" is DVD only gets
a reasonable amount of flak, but it tends to be deflected with "go use
the live CD" :)
> "should we include all locales or have regional variants",
Regional variants implies a need for more storage and more testing time.
That's the historical thinking anyway
> "do we support multi-lib out of the box".
The processor vendors are *huge* fans of this and users _who take
advantage of it_ are also. The argument is that without the 32bit-ness
available and there with no intervention needed, you might as well
switch to a different arch altogether.
Jeremy
More information about the Fedora-desktop-list
mailing list