f8 desktop livecd

Jeremy Katz katzj at redhat.com
Tue Aug 7 18:05:15 UTC 2007


On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 07:51 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> By having a much tighter focus we need to revisit some our goals. 

Just for historical background of a few of these (not saying we
shouldn't revisit them, but so everyone starts on the same page so to
speak)

> This includes goals like "is it important it fits on CD media", 

Feedback from non-US/non-European based locales is that CD media is
still very important.  The fact that the "Fedora spin" is DVD only gets
a reasonable amount of flak, but it tends to be deflected with "go use
the live CD" :)

> "should we include all locales or have regional variants", 

Regional variants implies a need for more storage and more testing time.
That's the historical thinking anyway

> "do we support multi-lib out of the box". 

The processor vendors are *huge* fans of this and users _who take
advantage of it_ are also.  The argument is that without the 32bit-ness
available and there with no intervention needed, you might as well
switch to a different arch altogether.

Jeremy




More information about the Fedora-desktop-list mailing list