[fedora-java] New file layout for nativified rpms
Gary Benson
gbenson at redhat.com
Wed Jul 6 13:01:11 UTC 2005
Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> Gary Benson wrote:
> > If compatibility _is_ broken, will it fail gracefully?
>
> libgcj 4.0.0 would crash if it saw a compiled class with an
> incompatible version ID, but this is fixed in 4.0.1 and 4.1. Now, we
> will silently refuse to load the class and fall back to the bytecode
> interpreter when a native-compiled class could not be loaded for
> some reason.
>
> But, I'm not sure that this is really the most "graceful" behaviour
> - the user could easily be unaware that their .so did not load and
> wonder why performance is bad. Other alternatives we could consider
> include:
>
> 1. Issue a warning before falling back to the bytecode interpreter
> 2. Throw a ClassFormatError/ClassNotFoundException/VerifyError
My vote would go for #1.
> Note that this will most likely happen when you try to run a newwer
> compiled class against an old runtime. In general, we will try to
> preserve backwards-compatibility so that old compiled classes will
> continue to work with new runtimes - although, as Tom points out, we
> don't yet guarantee it.
Cool.
More information about the fedora-devel-java-list
mailing list