[fedora-java] Re: Fedora Core 5 Wishlist

Gary Benson gbenson at redhat.com
Thu Sep 15 16:00:55 UTC 2005


Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Gary Benson wrote:
> > Suggestions welcome :)
> 
> I'm not sure what the best solution is, but here are some
> alternatives to consider:
> 
>   1.  Change the names of gcj packages, so that they don't match the
>       JPackage versions.  For example, gcj-tomcat5 could "provide"
>       tomcat5.  It should be pretty easy to conditionalize this in
>       the SPEC files.

You wouldn't believe how awful this is.  I've done it before, for
Stronghold.  It seems trivial, but it's actually a nightmare, and
the total package count in Stronghold was a tenth of what we're
dealing with now.

>   2.  Move the Fedora gcj packages into a separate repository from the
>       rest of the distribution.  This would at least allow people to
>       create a "pure" JPackage system by simply disabling this repo.
> 
> That's all I can think of for now.  Perhaps others have ideas.
> 
> -- 
> ========================================================================
> Ian Pilcher                                        i.pilcher at comcast.net
> ========================================================================
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list




More information about the fedora-devel-java-list mailing list