[JPackage-discuss] [fedora-java] Oh Poo. JPackages has too many depenency problems and it's been over a week!
Dan Thurman
dant at cdkkt.com
Mon Apr 10 23:34:27 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 10:54 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 10:40 -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> > On 4/10/06, Anthony Green <green % redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 11:47 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
> > > > What's the point of using JPackages if I cannot use it to update
> > > > Java components I need and want?
> > >
> > > I don't know. We don't recommend using the JPackages repos directly.
> >
> > This is of some concern to me also. We mostly use RHEL (FC for a little
> > testing) so it won't trickle down until RHEL5, but my understanding was
> > that Red Hat was adopting JPackage as the model for Java packages
> > in Fedora Core and Red Hat Enterprise. The official FC5 rpms even
> > have "jpp" in their names, for example ant-1.6.5-1jpp_7fc.i386.rpm .
> > Now, I understand that the "fc" also means that gjc-specific stuff is in
> > the rpm, but one advantage of JPackage is that you can easily switch
> > JVMs.
> >
> > Are you saying that with Red Hat is going to maintain a set of separate
> > packages and if you ever want any JPackages beyond that set you
> > shouldn't be using RHEL or Fedora Core?
> >
> > Dan: I don't know if you saw my earlier email, but you probably
> > just need to build your own stax-bea since it's non-free.
> > _______________________________________________
> > JPackage-discuss mailing list
> > JPackage-discuss at zarb.org
> > https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss
>
> I don't care about 'stax-bea'! This was added on later. I
> added this to the --exclude list and then there was another
> dependency. Add that, then another and the list seems long
> and I gave up after the 5th try because it was expanding into
> a hive of dependencies!
>
> So - in a nutshell... I cannot proceed with the simplest
> updates! Again, you cannot enable fpackage-fc because it
> does not exists. Someone wrote that its there for fc1-fc4
> but you are out of luck for fc5. So - I disabled that and
> tried [generic] and now disabled that. So - no updates are
> possible for me at this time.
>
> Kind regards,
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> JPackage-discuss mailing list
> JPackage-discuss at zarb.org
> https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss
OK, This is what I have done so far:
1) Downloaded: dom4j-1.6.1-1jpp.rpm
forced installed with no dependencies
2) Enabled jpackage repo [generic]
yum update
--exclude=stax-bea-1.0-2jpp
--exclude=castor\*
--exclude=geronimo-specs\*
Note: 1) In jpackage, there is both a bea-stax and stax-bea - confusing.
Cannot install this package no matter what I tried to do.
2) castor-depends is looking for: castor-0.9.6-2jpp and
it does not exist.
3) Cannot overwrite fc5's geronimo-specs\*
All files are updated except those excluded above.
Cheers,
Dan
More information about the fedora-devel-java-list
mailing list