[fedora-java] decoupling libgcj from gcc.src.rpm

[Mark Wielaard]

On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 10:52 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> The best scenario would be to fix CNI.  I'm kind of assuming we won't
> do that anytime soon though.

What would be needed to "fix CNI"?
Are there any drawbacks to fixing it?

Cheers,

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/attachments/20060612/7953d775/attachment.sig>